Every module reads gestational age from the Dating tab. Enter LMP, CRL, biometry, or IVF dates — the tool picks the best source per SOGC/ACOG rules.
2 Two modes
Quick: fast input → one result → one decision. Explore: expanded reference curves, teaching notes, measurement quality checklists, preset case scenarios.
3 Guideline picker
Choose your local standard (SOGC, ACOG, NICE, ISUOG, FMF). Thresholds adapt; alternate framework notes shown beneath when they differ.
4 Try a case
In Explore mode, each module has "Try a case" scenario buttons that populate the inputs with a real clinical example — watch the decision tree fire.
5 Report rail
Right side collects every module's key output. Copy to clipboard as a report snippet, or print a one-page summary for the chart. No patient data saved.
6 Privacy
Session-only. Nothing persists when the tab closes. Safe to use on any device — enter initials only, never full identifiers.
Initials
LMP— set in Dating
Current GA—
EDD—
Dating source—
Maternal risk factors
Dating & Redating
Module 01
What is this patient's gestational age, and should the EDD change?
IN LMP & cycle
T1 Crown-rump length
Use in T1 (roughly 7+0–13+6 wks). Robinson & Fleming formula.
Hadlock composite dating (least accurate method — used when no prior US and no reliable LMP).
IVF IVF dating (optional)
IVF dating supersedes all other methods — used as primary when provided.
OUT Dating outputs
GA by LMP—
GA by CRL (Robinson-Fleming)—
GA by biometry (Hadlock)—
GA by IVF—
EDD—
Why this matters
Accurate dating anchors every downstream decision: growth percentiles, timing of screening, delivery thresholds, BPP interpretation, and preterm-labour cutoffs all depend on GA. A redating error of even a few days at term can misclassify post-dates management. The dating hierarchy exists because LMP recall is unreliable in many patients (irregular cycles, missed bleeds, recent hormonal contraception), while earliest ultrasound is most accurate. Robinson-Fleming CRL at 7–12 wk is accurate to within ±5–7 days; by T3, biometry dating error spreads to ±3 weeks.
Try a case
Biometry & EFW
Module 02
Is this fetus growing appropriately for its gestational age?
Axial plane at level of thalami & cavum septi pellucidi
Symmetric hemispheres; midline falx centered
Calipers outer-to-inner (leading-edge to leading-edge) — convention varies; note which you use
Cerebellum and orbits should not be visible in this plane
Head shape should be oval (cephalic index 74–83%); dolichocephaly over-estimates HC, under-estimates BPD
AC Abdominal circumference
quality ✓AC checklist (ISUOG):
Transverse section at level of stomach and portal sinus
One full rib visible on each side (symmetric); kidneys should not be visible
Shape as circular as possible
Calipers on outer skin surface; use ellipse tool
AC is the single most sensitive parameter for growth restriction — never rely on other parameters if AC is low
FL checklist: full shaft visible, 45–90° to beam, exclude distal epiphysis & soft tissue. Femur bowing may under-measure.
+ Growth standard (Explore mode)
Hadlock is a reference (how babies do grow); INTERGROWTH-21st and WHO are prescriptive standards (how babies should grow under optimal conditions). Prescriptive standards typically flag more fetuses as SGA. In Explore mode all three are shown side-by-side.
OUT Estimated fetal weight
EFW (Hadlock 4)—
Formula used—
EFW percentile (selected standard)—
Hadlock 1991 %ile—
INTERGROWTH-21st %ile—
WHO %ile—
RAT Proportionality ratios
HC / AC—
FL / AC—
FL / BPD—
Symmetry assessment—
Why this matters
AC is the most sensitive single parameter for fetal growth restriction — before EFW crosses the 10th percentile, AC often does. An isolated AC < 10th %ile with normal Doppler still warrants follow-up; it is a recognised flag for early placental dysfunction (ISUOG 2020). Symmetric vs asymmetric growth restriction matters: asymmetric (elevated HC/AC, brain-sparing) suggests placental cause and is usually late-onset; symmetric suggests earlier insult (infection, aneuploidy, constitutional). Choice of standard matters too — a Hadlock-10th-percentile fetus may be at the INTERGROWTH-3rd percentile. Canadian SOGC #442 (2023) still permits local or Hadlock references; ISUOG 2020 recommends a prescriptive standard where available.
Try a case
Amniotic fluid
Module 03
Is amniotic fluid adequate for gestational age?
SDP Single deepest pocket
quality ✓SDP / MVP checklist:
Pocket must be free of umbilical cord and fetal parts
Vertical depth only (AP), not transverse; perpendicular to floor
Pocket width must be ≥ 1 cm to count
Measure in maternal longitudinal plane; transducer parallel to sagittal axis
Do not compress the uterus with the probe
Preferred over AFI per SMFM Consult Series #67 (2022) — AFI over-diagnoses oligo & poly without outcome benefit.
AFI Amniotic fluid index (optional)
quality ✓AFI four-quadrant checklist:
Maternal abdomen divided by umbilicus (transverse) and linea nigra (sagittal)
Vertical depth of largest pocket in each quadrant; sum all four
Pockets must be cord/body-part free with width ≥ 1 cm
Transducer perpendicular to floor, parallel to maternal sagittal plane
Moore-Cayle 5th/95th percentile range by GA shown in output. Use SDP for clinical decisions.
+ Context flags
OUT Fluid assessment
Category (SDP-primary)—
SDP band—
AFI band—
AFI percentile (Moore-Cayle)—
AFI expected range @ GA (5th–95th)—
Why this matters
SDP is preferred over AFI — the SMFM Consult Series #67 (2022), Cochrane 2008, and SOGC all agree: AFI over-diagnoses oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios without reducing perinatal morbidity. Interventions (inductions, sections) triggered by AFI alone expose mother and fetus to iatrogenic harm. Oligohydramnios reflects the fetal urine-output pathway: think ROM, renal agenesis/dysplasia, lower-tract obstruction, severe placental insufficiency (FGR). A comprehensive anatomy survey (especially kidneys and bladder) is essential. Polyhydramnios reflects impaired swallowing, increased urine output, or membrane pathology: GI obstruction (TEF, duodenal atresia), neuromuscular disorders, fetal hydrops, maternal GDM, multiples (TTTS), infection (CMV, syphilis, parvovirus). Idiopathic in ~60% of mild cases — but mild poly that progresses warrants work-up.
Try a case
Doppler indices
Module 04
Is placental and fetal circulation adequate?
UA Umbilical artery
quality ✓UA Doppler checklist (ISUOG):
Free-loop cord segment (not placental or fetal insertion) for screening
Sample volume ≤ 5 mm, angle of insonation as close to 0° as possible
Wall filter low (50–100 Hz); PRF adjusted to avoid aliasing
Absent fetal breathing & movement artifact during recording
At least 3 consistent waveforms; record from same cord loop bilaterally if discordant
Pulsatility index (PI) recommended over RI/S:D by ISUOG. Expected range shown in outputs.
AEDF / REDF are the single most clinically important Doppler findings — they drive delivery timing independently of EFW percentile.
MCA Middle cerebral artery
PSV for anemia (Mari 2000) — MoM calculated vs expected median; ≥1.5 MoM predicts moderate-severe fetal anemia and triggers IUT discussion.
UtA Uterine artery
Best screening window: 11–14 wk (first-trim PE screen) and 19–24 wk (mid-trim). Sampling per FMF technique.
DV Ductus venosus (optional, T3)
Used in severe early-onset FGR for delivery timing (TRUFFLE). DV PI > 95th %ile or absent/reversed a-wave = delivery indication.
OUT Percentiles & ratios
UA PI (Acharya 2005)—
MCA PI (Ciobanu 2019)—
CPR (MCA PI / UA PI)—
UCR (UA PI / MCA PI) · Flatley/DeVore—
MCA PSV MoM (Mari)—
UtA PI percentile—
Why this matters
UA Doppler drives delivery timing. In early-onset FGR (<32 wk), the TRUFFLE trial showed DV PI-based timing improves survival without disability vs CTG-based timing. In late-onset FGR, CPR (MCA PI / UA PI) <5th %ile is the key marker: it identifies brain-sparing before UA becomes abnormal and is linked to stillbirth risk and adverse neonatal outcome even in AGA fetuses. UCR (UA PI / MCA PI, Flatley & DeVore 2019) is being proposed as a more sensitive alternative to CPR in late pregnancy because its distribution is more symmetric. We show both — CPR remains the guideline-referenced index. MCA PSV ≥ 1.5 MoM (Mari 2000) predicts moderate-severe fetal anemia with ~100% sensitivity and drives IUT discussion. UtA PI in T1 feeds FMF's multi-marker pre-eclampsia screen (combined with MAP, PlGF, PAPP-A); high in T2 predicts late-onset PE and FGR.
Try a case
First trimester screen
Module 05 · educational
How do the individual markers read — and what category of risk does the picture point toward?
Note on scope: This panel is an educational interpretive tool for individual first-trimester markers. Quantitative combined-test risk must come from your FMF-licensed risk engine (fetalmedicine.org) or equivalent certified software. No risk number from this tool should be used for clinical decisions — only the individual marker readings and the qualitative "risk category" should be used as a sanity check against your licensed calculator.
CRL Crown-rump length (scan validity)
Combined test valid only when CRL is 45–84 mm (~11+0–13+6 wk).
NT Nuchal translucency
quality ✓NT measurement checklist (FMF):
Fetus in mid-sagittal plane, neutral position (not flexed or extended)
Magnification so head + thorax fill >75% of screen
Calipers on-to-on, perpendicular to long axis of fetus
Measure at widest point, distinguishing nuchal skin from amnion
Record the largest of ≥3 measurements
Operator must hold current FMF certification
+ Additional markers (optional)
LAB Biochemistry (MoM)
Typical T21 pattern: low PAPP-A, high β-hCG. T18/T13: both low. Biochemistry alone has low detection; strength is in the combined algorithm.
AGE Maternal age
Background T21 risk at term: ~1/1500 at age 20; ~1/900 at 30; ~1/250 at 35; ~1/70 at 40; ~1/20 at 45.
OUT Marker interpretation
Risk category (qualitative)—
NT for CRL—
NT flag—
Background risk (age only)—
Abnormal markers—
Why this matters
The combined test's strength is that no single marker makes or breaks it — each has a likelihood ratio that shifts the patient's background (age-derived) risk up or down. The FMF algorithm combines them multiplicatively. NT > 3.5 mm (≥99th %ile) is independently important even if aneuploidy is ruled out — it flags 10–30% of structural anomalies, especially cardiac, and warrants detailed anatomy + fetal echo at 20–22 wk. cfDNA (NIPT) has largely superseded combined-test screening for high-risk indications — detection for T21 ≥99%, T18 ~97%, T13 ~87%. Combined test retains value in low-resource settings and flags the non-trisomy NT-linked pathway.
Try a case
Cervical length
Module 06 · PTB risk
Is this cervix at elevated preterm-birth risk, and does the finding trigger progesterone or cerclage?
TAS CL > 35 mm usually rules out short TVU CL if TVU unavailable
CTX Context
Prior sPTB is the single strongest risk factor and changes management thresholds.
OUT Interpretation
CL category—
GA at measurement—
Why these thresholds
25 mm at 16–24 wk is the cutoff for intervention in both singletons and twins (EPPPIC IPD meta-analysis 2021). 15 mm marks very-short cervix with ~ 50% PTB < 32 wk risk.
Cerclage is evidence-based only in singletons with prior sPTB + current short CL — ultrasound-indicated cerclage (NNT ~8 per MRC/Berghella). Routine cerclage in twins or in singletons without prior PTB is not supported.
Funneling adds no independent prognostic value beyond the remaining CL; measure the still-closed portion only.
Try a case
Biophysical profile
Module 07 · fetal wellbeing
Is this fetus showing signs of acute or chronic asphyxia — and does the picture support delivery?
BPP Five components (each 0 or 2)
Reactive = ≥ 2 accelerations ≥ 15 bpm × 15 s over 20 min (> 32 wk) or 10 bpm × 10 s (< 32 wk).
OUT Score
BPP score—
NST—
AFV—
Tone—
Movement—
Breathing—
Component ordering by hypoxia sensitivity
As fetal hypoxia develops, components disappear in the reverse order of ontogeny: breathing lost first (~CNS centre at 20–21 wk), then movement, tone, and finally heart-rate reactivity (~26–28 wk centre). AFV reflects chronic hypoxia (redistribution → reduced renal perfusion → oligohydramnios). So oligo + otherwise reassuring acute components = chronic insult; reassuring fluid + multiple acute findings lost = acute insult. Either trumps an unweighted score.
Try a case
Multiples
Module 08 · twin surveillance
What type of twins — and does today's picture show TTTS, sFGR, or TAPS?
TAPS: one > 1.5 MoM (anaemic donor) + other < 1.0 MoM (polycythaemic recipient), without TTTS-type fluid discordance.
OUT Surveillance summary
EFW discordance—
Discordance band—
TTTS—
sFGR—
TAPS—
Why chorionicity dictates everything
DCDA has essentially-independent placentas and behaves like two singletons; MCDA shares vascular anastomoses and therefore risks TTTS (fluid discordance), sFGR (unequal placental share with asymmetric flow), and TAPS (gradual red-cell transfer without fluid shift). Get chorionicity right in the first trimester (λ vs T sign, membrane count) — mis-assignment makes the rest of surveillance meaningless.
Try a case
References & guideline index
✦
Compiled reference list added alongside module implementations.